Bond ETF Investing: What to Consider When Selecting a Fund
Title: Bond ETF Investing: What to consider when selecting a fund
Description: Manager selection is paramount when selecting ETFs for fixed income investing. Learn about the structural advantages of ETFs and additional considerations when using fixed income ETFs. Explore the benefits active fixed income ETFs bring to your practice.
Text on screen: PIMCO
Text on screen: PIMCO provides services only to qualified institutions and investors. This is not an offer to any person in any jurisdiction where unlawful or unauthorized.
Text on screen: John Nersesian, HEAD OF ADVISOR EDUCATION
Nersesian: Hi everybody, I'm John Nersesian, head of Advisor Education at PIMCO. Thank you for joining us for our conversation today around the concept of ETF fixed income investing.
I'm so pleased to be joined by my colleague Dave Braun. Dave is a managing director and a fixed income portfolio manager for PIMCO. Welcome Dave.
Braun: Thank you for having me.
Nersesian: So, Dave, let's start at the top. Tell us what are the structural advantages or opportunities of using an ETF to gain access to fixed income.
Braun: The bond market is relatively inefficient, you know, relatively high transaction costs.
Text on screen: David L. Braun, PORTFOLIO MANAGER
So, a well-diversified high quality ETF, like BOND is a way to get diversified access to the bond market with minimal transaction costs. And the ETF vehicle itself daily, daily trading. Intraday trading, daily transparency. Just a way for investors to get access to an one ticket at one share class fee exposure to a broad basket of securities.
And behind the scenes there are market makers and authorized participants ready and willing to create at NAV pricing. When there's a big inflow into a fund or an outflow into a fund. So, you know, any good active management ETF shop has a capital markets desk that can help the advisors out there and their investors gain access to the fund.
Nersesian: Tell us a little bit about the advantage of using an active approach in that space.
Braun: Yeah. So you're opening the can of worms of the big debate about active versus passive. Right. And when you look at… Let's look at equity funds first, there are data and most folks in the industry's data shows that the active managers do have a tough time beating their passive peers.
Text on screen: FULL PAGE GRAPHIC: TITLE – Percentage of active funds within each category that outperformed their benchmark (10-year). The bar chart shows the Morningstar Fixed Income categories in the blue bars and the Morningstar equity categories in the green bars. The blue bars on the left shows four fixed income categories outperforming their benchmarks, with 80% of Intermediate Core and Core Plus funds outperforming, 83% of Short-Term Bond funds outperforming, 78% of Ultrashort Bond funds outperforming, and 39% of High Yield Bond Funds outperforming. A yellow line running across the four blue bars represents the average outperformance across the bond categories, at around 79%. The green bars on the right show equity categories, with 18% of Large Blend funds outperforming their benchmarks, 24% of Large Growth outperforming, 42% of Large Value outperforming, 56% of Foreign Large Blend outperforming, and 53% of Diversified Emerging Markets outperforming. A yellow line that runs across the five green bars represents the average outperformance across equity categories, at around 43%.
Only about 30% of them, you know, successfully beat the passive peer.
Braun: And everyone just knee-jerk thought, oh, that must be true for bonds too. On our website, you go see our research, we believe bonds are different. The active managers have historically had success being the passive peer groups. So, the tune of about 80% of core and core plus actively managed funds have beaten their passive peer groups over the last decade. So, the data's different. Now, we would also argue it's a challenge to replicate the Agg in and of itself.
Nersesian: Okay. Why is that?
Braun: Yeah. Well, one, unlike the S&P 500, 500 means 500 securities. The Agg has over 13,000 securities in it.
Text on screen: FULL PAGE GRAPHIC: TITLE – Index structure radically different than equities.The chart on the left shows a blue bar with 13, 617, which are the number of holdings within the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The blue bar on the right shows 503, which are holdings within the S&P 500 Index. The table on the top right shows the standardization, life, new issuance, and trading characteristics of stocks and bonds. The differences between stocks and bonds are as follows: Standardization for stocks is high and various for bonds; Life for stocks is perpetual and finite for bonds; new issuance is infrequent for stocks and frequent for bonds; and trading is done on exchanges for stocks and over the counter for bonds.
So, it's more complicated. The S&P 500 has minimal turnover every year as a few names drop outta the S&P 500 few names come in. The Barclays Agg has over 25% turnover a year. So, you're chasing a more complicated index trying to replicate it and with varying degrees of success.
And then a couple of reasons why we think active work in the bond market, but not in the equity market. The equity market's very efficient exchange traded whereas the bond market is less efficient and more opaque. It's over the counter traded and a large active manager like PIMCO can garner both an information and an execution edge to deliver alpha versus someone just trying to replicate the index. Another thing to think about is how's the index constructed? If you think about the Bloomberg US Aggregate, It's debt weighted. So you're by definition buying the bonds of people who are borrowing more and more, who are more indebted.
Nersesian: They construct the index based on the largest borrowers. Who by definition are more indebted and therefore maybe have a lower credit quality.
Braun: Yeah. So I, I always joke that if you and I open up Dave and John's bank. And our underwriting manual where we decided to give out loans was solely based on how much existing debt you have. outstanding. If they had a lot outstanding, we'd give 'em a loan. If they had no debt or very little debt, we might not give 'em a loan or we give 'em a very small loan. It's kinda the opposite of how you would want to actually lend money, right? So, that's what you're doing, you buy the index.
Another interesting thing is what's good for the issuers of the debt might not be good for the buyers of the bonds. Well, you and I were talking about this earlier. If you look at the Barclays Aggregate or the US Aggregate, 15 years ago, it was two years shorter than it's today.
Why, why is it longer now? Well, issuers whose bonds are going in the index are smart. We were at once in a generation low end rates, they issued more debt out the curve. So, that extended the index. If you're a passive replicator, you're along for the ride. The US Treasury, the treasuries in there, the US households and their mortgages and corporates, and the corporates in there all said, I'm gonna extend my maturity profile. And you went along for the ride. You rented them more and more out of the curve at all-time lows and rates.
Nersesian: How many investors do you think really know that the investor who chooses a passive approach to fixed income buys the Agg doesn't necessarily realize that the characteristics of what they own have changed materially and may not necessarily meet their objectives?
Nersesian: So, there are advantages, liquidity, transparency, diversification, professional management, they all sound pretty compelling. Now, there are some characteristics that we often use as investment consultants to really measure, if you will, the effectiveness, the skill of that manager. We look at things like tracking error, we look at things like information ratio. We look at things like active shares. Do you wanna speak to some of those characteristics specifically?
Braun: Yeah. So we believe that, you know, that rather than looking at how you measure a passive manager, it's gonna all be, you know, fees and tracking error to the index. How tight are they matching it?
Nersesian: Those are the only two things we look at for a passive manager.
Braun: People care about. We think in active, you've gotta expand what you look at. You obviously gotta look at their alpha both before and net a fee. The alpha, they're generating above and beyond that passive index. But then we are, we would argue that number's, not the end all be all, you need to dig deeper. How are they getting that alpha? Right? And as you alluded to with information ratios and sharp ratios, what is the risk adjusted return they're getting on the volatility they're taking? So, a metric like that is a good way to look at it. We also believe people should study the manager's consistency of alpha. Is their alpha flailing around very high, very low from year to year? Or is it more steady in grinding it out?
Nersesian: Right.
Braun: Another thing is how do they perform over different parts of the business cycle? This is a key one. There are a lot of credit heavy core and core plus managers out there who put so much credit risk into a core bond fund. Works really well during the expansionary part of the economic cycle when stocks are going up, that credit's doing well. But then as soon as you hit a slowdown in the economy, stocks fall, that credit risk they put in the portfolio starts behaving like equity risk. And that's exactly when you want your bond fund to be that ballast in your portfolio.
Nersesian: So, you've got that flexibility. If you feel we're at a different part of the economic cycle, you can amp up or amp down.
Braun: And right now, given valuations and where we are in the cycle, we have taken credit risk down.
Nersesian: I like your approach to this, Dave. It's not just, am I getting an excess return? The question is, how am I getting it?
Braun: And is it sustainable and durable?
Nersesian: Is it gonna be persistent for me? Am I setting myself up for future under performance?
Braun: Exactly.
Nersesian: I love those comments. Well, Dave, I want to thank you for spending some time with us today. Very helpful, very educational, and I wanna thank our audience for spending some time with us as well. If you'd like to learn more about this or other PIMCO strategies, we encourage you to visit us@PIMCO.com or to contact your PIMCO account manager.
Text on screen: For more insights and information visit PIMCO.com
Text on screen: PIMCO
Disclosure
The discussion and content provided within this video is intended for informational purposes and may not be appropriate for all investors. The information included herein is not based on any particularized financial situation, or need, and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, a forecast, research, investment advice or a recommendation for any specific PIMCO or other security, strategy, product or service. Fixed income is only one possible portion of an investor’s portfolio, which can also include equities and other products. Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. Investors should speak to their financial advisors regarding the investment mix that may be right for them based on their financial situation and investment objective.
Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the funds carefully before investing. This and other information are contained in the fund’s prospectus and summary prospectus, if available, which may be obtained by contacting your investment professional or PIMCO representative or by visiting www.PIMCO.com. Please read them carefully before you invest or send money.
Exchange Traded Funds (“ETF”) are afforded certain exemptions from the Investment Company Act. The exemptions allow, among other things, for individual shares to trade on the secondary market. Individual shares cannot be directly purchased from or redeemed by the ETF. Purchases and redemptions directly with ETFs are only accomplished through creation unit aggregations or “baskets” of shares. Shares of an ETF, traded on the secondary market, are bought and sold at market price (not NAV). Brokerage commissions will reduce returns. Investment policies, management fees and other information can be found in the individual ETF’s prospectus. Buying or selling ETF shares on an exchange may require the payment of fees, such as brokerage commissions, and other fees to financial intermediaries. In addition, an investor may incur costs attributed to the difference between the highest price a buyer is willing to pay to purchase shares of the Fund (bid) and the lowest price a seller is willing to accept for shares of the Fund (ask) when buying or selling shares in the secondary market (the bid-ask spread). Due to the costs inherent in buying or selling Fund shares, frequent trading may detract significantly from investment returns. Investment in Fund shares may not be advisable for investors who expect to engage in frequent trading. Current holdings are subject to risk. Holdings are subject to change at any time. An investment in an ETF involves risk, including the loss of principal. Investment return, price, yield and Net Asset Value (NAV) will fluctuate with changes in market conditions. Investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed. Premium/Discount is the difference between the market price and NAV expressed as a percentage of NAV. The Gross Expense Ratio for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund (BOND) is 0.58% and the Adjusted Expense Ratio is 0.55%. The Adjusted Expense Ratio excludes certain investment expenses, such as interest expense from borrowings and repurchase agreements and dividend expense from investments on short sales, incurred directly by the Fund or indirectly through the Fund’s investments in underlying PIMCO Funds (if applicable), none of which are paid to PIMCO.
A word about risk: All investments contain risk and may lose value. Investing in the bond market is subject to certain risks including the risk that fixed income securities will decline in value because of changes in interest rates; the risk that fund shares could trade at prices other than the net asset value; and the risk that the manager's investment decisions might not produce the desired results. Investing in foreign denominated and/or domiciled securities may involve heightened risk due to currency fluctuations, and economic and political risks, which may be enhanced in emerging markets. Mortgage and asset-backed securities may be sensitive to changes in interest rates, subject to early repayment risk, and their value may fluctuate in response to the market’s perception of issuer creditworthiness; while generally supported by some form of government or private guarantee there is no assurance that private guarantors will meet their obligations. High-yield, lower-rated, securities involve greater risk than higher-rated securities; portfolios that invest in them may be subject to greater levels of credit and liquidity risk than portfolios that do not. Equities may decline in value due to both real and perceived general market, economic, and industry conditions. Derivatives may involve certain costs and risks such as liquidity, interest rate, market, credit, management and the risk that a position could not be closed when most advantageous. Investing in derivatives could lose more than the amount invested. Diversification does not ensure against loss.
MORNINGSTAR CATEGORIES: Ultrashort Bond portfolios invest primarily in investment-grade U.S. fixed-income issues and have durations typically of less than one year. This category can include corporate or government ultrashort bond portfolios, but it excludes international, convertible, multisector, and high-yield bond portfolios. Because of their focus on bonds with very short durations, these portfolios offer minimal interest-rate sensitivity and therefore low risk and total return potential. Morningstar calculates monthly breakpoints using the effective duration of the Morningstar Core Bond Index in determining duration assignment. Ultrashort is defined as 25% of the three-year average effective duration of the MCBI. Intermediate Core Bond portfolios invest primarily in investment-grade U.S. fixed-income issues including government, corporate, and securitized debt, and hold less than 5% in below-investment-grade exposures. Their durations (a measure of interest-rate sensitivity) typically range between 75% and 125% of the three-year average of the effective duration of the Morningstar Core Bond Index. Intermediate Core-Plus Bond portfolios invest primarily in investment-grade U.S. fixed-income issues including government, corporate, and securitized debt, but generally have greater flexibility than core offerings to hold non-core sectors such as corporate high yield, bank loan, emerging-markets debt, and non-U.S. currency exposures. Their durations (a measure of interest-rate sensitivity) typically range between 75% and 125% of the three-year average of the effective duration of the Morningstar Core Bond Index. High Yield Bond portfolios concentrate on lower-quality bonds, which are riskier than those of higher-quality companies. These portfolios generally offer higher yields than other types of portfolios, but they are also more vulnerable to economic and credit risk. These portfolios primarily invest in U.S. high-income debt securities where at least 65% or more of bond assets are not rated or are rated by a major agency such as Standard & Poor's or Moody's at the level of BB (considered speculative for taxable bonds) and below. Large Blend portfolios are fairly representative of the overall U.S. stock market in size, growth rates, and price. Stocks in the top 70% of the capitalization of the U.S. equity market are defined as large cap. The blend style is assigned to portfolios where neither growth nor value characteristics. Foreign Large Blend portfolios invest in a variety of big international stocks. Most of these portfolios divide their assets among a dozen or more developed markets, including Japan, Britain, France, and Germany. These portfolios primarily invest in stocks that have market caps in the top 70% of each economically integrated market (such as Europe or Asia ex-Japan). The blend style is assigned to portfolios where neither growth nor value characteristics predominate. These portfolios typically will have less than 20% of assets invested in U.S. stocks. Diversified Emerging Markets portfolios tend to divide their assets among 20 or more nations, although they tend to focus on the emerging markets of Asia and Latin America rather than on those of the Middle East, Africa, or Europe. These portfolios invest predominantly in emerging market equities, but some funds also invest in both equities and fixed income investments from emerging markets. © 2024 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index represents securities that are SEC-registered, taxable, and dollar denominated. The index covers the U.S. investment grade fixed rate bond market, with index components for government and corporate securities, mortgage pass-through securities, and asset-backed securities. These major sectors are subdivided into more specific indices that are calculated and reported on a regular basis. S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged market index generally considered representative of the stock market as a whole. The Index focuses on the large-cap segment of the U.S. equities market. It is not possible to invest directly in an unmanaged index or Morningstar category.
The credit quality of a particular security or group of securities does not ensure the stability or safety of an overall portfolio. The quality ratings of individual issues/issuers are provided to indicate the credit-worthiness of such issues/issuer and generally range from AAA, Aaa, or AAA (highest) to D, C, or D (lowest) for S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch respectively.
Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are appropriate for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Outlook and strategies are subject to change without notice.
PIMCO as a general matter provides services to qualified institutions, financial intermediaries and institutional investors. Individual investors should contact their own financial professional to determine the most appropriate investment options for their financial situation. This material contains the opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO is a trademark of Allianz Asset Management of America LLC in the United States and throughout the world. ©2024, PIMCO.
PIMCO Investments LLC, distributor, 1633 Broadway, New York, NY 10019, is a company of PIMCO.
CMR2024-0618-3646425