Many active equity funds have underperformed their passive counterparts over the past decade, leading to a preference for passive equity investments—and passive equity ETFs. However, the story is different for bonds when comparing performance between active and passive approaches.
Because bond markets and bond indexes are larger and less efficient than their equity peers, active management has a better chance of delivering index-beating returns in fixed income. In fact, 85% of active fixed income funds (including active ETFs) outperformed their passive peers, net of fees, over the last 10 years, compared to 40% of active equity funds. (Source: PIMCO and Morningstar as of 31 December 2024).
Unlike the majority of passive ETFs, active ETFs can provide access to a team of investment specialists, extensive credit research resources, quantitative analysis and robust risk management expertise. This allows experienced active managers to analyse a wide range of factors when deciding which bonds to buy and sell, which may help active ETFs outperform passive approaches.